There had
been a perfect storm in the 1970s, just as the UK economy had started to
recover in the post war era. The perfect storm included the oil crises of 1973
and 1979 when the price per barrel of oil shot up by 400%. The Coal miners went
on strike and this led to a 3-day week. I can remember that quite vividly, as I
started my working life during the cold winter months, working in the office
with lanterns and coats on! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Day_Week
This led to
a sense of an urgent need for a new agenda and Mrs Thatcher came to power in
1979 on a strong right of centre agenda to reduce government’s role in industry
and to take back control from the Trade Unions. Privatization followed and
capitalism took root. There is another story to be told another time. The point
here is that the decimation of the publicly owned dated industries in coal
and steel (in particular) meant that
something had to be done to cope with the mass unemployment that resulted
from the new policies.
With a
strongly held philosophy of individual responsibility, the Government, together
with big businesses began to establish support for start-ups. They also
introduced subsidies for small established firms to assist them with marketing,
training and various Awards were also born at this time to help create a
positive atmosphere and help celebrate success (however it was defined).
At regional
levels Agencies were created to direct the funding from Government towards all
the various campaigns of activity (I can recall evaluating 22 of them), while
social enterprises were created such as Business in the Community; Prince’s
Youth Business Trust and Shell Livewire.
The
Government’s iconic Dept of Trade and Industry was led by Michael Helestine who
was very active in promoting a strong message. His demeanor and golden hair
bobbing about in interviews earned him the nick name of Tarzan. There was no
question – his drive and passion pushed along the free market agenda and
support for SMEs, as did the energy of Lord Young and numerous others.
The point
here is to learn from the lessons of history – and for Government which is
being amazingly proactive in supporting firms to hold on to talent and families’ survival – might consider directing some of the
unemployment benefits and regulations towards enabling individuals into self-employment or the creation of new
businesses.
Owing to
the effects of the period of austerity (by the Conservative Party) we have been
left with Agencies that are dehydrated and lacking anything other than boxes
they can tick. From national agencies that existed in the 1970s and 1980s,
policies changed to go regional and have since been
further localized with Local Enterprise Partnerships. So, we are now in a
position when no one can take a big picture view of what to do. For local, I
also read parochial and this is where the disconnects can arise between what we
need now to recover from the shock of Covid 19 and what exists as
infrastructure to help solve the problems.
Employment
protection and shielding the economy from bankruptcies is crucial for now but I
suspect we will all change the way we do things and so entrepreneurs need to be
encouraged to come forward with creative and sustainable solutions.
Over the
past few decades Universities had become hubs for new venture creation through
investments in the Higher Education Innovation Fund and a variety of other
resources being directed to them. But – the main source of funds have been
international students and that is going to be very hard hit, compounded by
narrow views on the issuing of student visas. This means that what would
otherwise be strong regional institutions with the capacity and capabilities
for stimulating new venture creation are vulnerable.
The
Government, especially the Chancellor seems to be jumping from one policy tree
to another on job retention but who is there are the senior policy level to put
out the Tarzan like jungle call for job creation? Does the Government expect
job creation to be from state and established enterprise. What will fuel their
growth to create those jobs? We are back to the debates of the later 1980s when
Business Growth became the focus on policies – in search of the magic 4% of
firms that were so-called Gazelles. These were due to create the jobs, but in
reality as policy makers abandoned the search for Gazelles and more recently
for unicorns, private sector business angels, accelerators and incubators have
been filing the void. And they too are now challenged by what has happened to financial
markets and rental incomes.
Having checked with the Chairman of Enterprise Educators
UK – Gareth Trainer – we agreed that it is time for a flagship business
creation agency or campaign to go beyond enhanced career prospects. The reality
of trying to find apprenticeships with companies struggling to survive just
seems unrealistic if worthwhile.
As Gareth pointed out: “The Government has rightly
identified that youth unemployment and career glass ceilings are going to apply.
Why not stimulate youth entrepreneurship?
They commissioned the Prince’s Trust to review youth entrepreneurship
policy ages ago and the Government still haven’t allowed their report to be
fully published… what are they waiting for? Meanwhile Ofsted have removed from
the inspectorate the role of national lead for business, economics and
enterprise, leaving the remaining subject heads to “look out’ for enterprise in
schools… I think without expert help that is likely to be challenging. I guess, in summary, there doesn't seem to be comparable levels of Government noise about self-employment and entrepreneurship as there was following previous economic crises."
There is some good news on the horizon, in the sense that
policies are going to be put in place for a Green agenda that is going to make
a difference. We are also likely to see other measures for the enhancement of
science and technology and perhaps various rescue packages for certain
industries.
We clearly need new ideas and solutions at this time. This
would be good news at macro levels together with any fiscal and economic
policies to support the movement.
At meso levels we need regional and industry sectors to
be strengthened to cope with what happens on the ground. Many of the agencies
that exist – just exist. Austerity has affected them all and we need them to be
empowered and skilled up as well as scaled up to cope with what is needed.
And at a micro level, COVID 19 has made us look both
inside and outside for how we not only come out of the crisis, but how we
recreate the future. At Universities(for example) – can placement years in universities be
converted to self-employed placement years; fewer businesses will have the
funding or environment to support traditional placements so this seems like a
fix that could have broader impact.
We need
fresh insights in policy and a new discourse needs to be created from the
Billions being put into the economy for job protection towards job creation,
turbo charging the agenda through new venture creation and appropriate work
experiences.
And, can we
get a modern day cheer leader, a new Tarzan, whose word counts for something
working with a community of people who know what they are talking about.
No comments:
Post a Comment